[ prog / sol / mona ]

prog


SUBLEQ status?

1 2024-06-01 21:34

It had an entire an OS made for it http://users.atw.hu/gerigeri/DawnOS/index.html

Runs agonizingly slow and wastes more memory than GNU Emacs.

Similar project, but even more retarded:
https://github.com/Jellonator/Nandlang

2 2024-06-01 21:38

To be honest, it works several times faster than the modern Linux:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Emn-UF4ArWk

3 2024-06-02 00:16 *

if you are serious subleq is an eccentric idea but the original subleq operating system not dawnos was written by a certain "child" and never got anywhere

4 2024-06-02 00:44

>>3
Japanese proposed a 2 instructions extension
https://janders.eecg.utoronto.ca/pdfs/esl.pdf

It speeds SUBLEQ up like 5 times so it becomes practical.

5 2024-06-02 01:28

>>4
which defeats the asinine simplicity purpose of atleast dawnos midori neko
im not sure what the purpose of "subleq os" was but it was on some obscure forum that was barely about niche operating systems and it looked similar to dawnos really bad interface but came long before 2017
the author was acting how do you say it like a netizen child and most of the forum didnt take him seriously
imo you basically spelled out the issue with the subleq instruction in >>1 "fixing it" by putting in more instructions fails oisc subleq is not a good instruction for "practical oisc" no matter how obvious of a choice it is this shows some of the vast fallacious contradicting logic in this project you need a extremely complex oisc instruction to make it practical not something that does rebound jmp
this paper calls it tisc vary bait and switchy or maybe it was written as a subtle joke on the unpractical subleq oisc case
i mean its using words like bloat seriously monadic can be meme worthy too but its used properly here disregard subleq is already esoteric operating system meme terminology

6 2024-06-02 01:30 *

also the filename is esl im sure you are doing this on purpose

7 2024-06-02 13:36

>>5
Very complex instruction word computer.

Consider ChatGPT. At its core is a tensor-matrix multiplication instruction.

In general, multiplying the machine's state by a matrix can produce arbitrary change.

So why not make tensor-matrix multiplication into an OISC?

Take VLIW to its maximum potential!!!

8 2024-06-03 00:33 *

>>7
they call this meme a single functor supercombinator smd monad but its a processor instruction and it requires a processor that isnt stack backed certain mills maybe or has >99 primary stacks
in a way this is like a pseudo visc with programmable microcode much like lisp processors are but its a different design to get there
unlike niscs oisc isnt vary interesting and if the ai lab was still going strong machines would have both properly programmable visc ciscs and neuron nisc processors

9 2024-06-17 22:10

Pretty much dead.

10


VIP:

do not edit these