Do you really think it's a great idea to have an automatic spam-filter mod that mutes people for "shitposting" or using "emotionally manipulative language"?
Learn to read, retard. CRM114 is the exact opposite. There is no centralized algorithm. There is uncensored broadcasting where the recipient determines what the definition of noise is.
I just can't envision it being effective at curbing things like flame-wars and trolling, which have been a thing long before platform algorithms.
Yeah, because you're a mutilated illiterate.
Imho that can be addressed only by active and strict human moderation, which I've seen happen a few times in small communities.
govern me harder, daddy
Tell me how you're a zoomer without telling me you're a zoomer.
Sounds a lot like mastodon, matrix, etc... I'm disappointed that you haven't mentioned those, but anyway, what are your thoughts about them?
Federated narrowcasting is suburbia with shittier HOAs.
Also, what do you think of Signal's author thoughts on decentralized systems?
The majority of the original cypherpunks are dead from "suicide" or in prison. Moxie somehow escaped both fates and created a well-funded, centralized protocol that makes obfuscated encryption into a trust-by-benevolence model. You know, because the plebs can't understand PGP, which you definitely shouldn't use, because reasons.
As far as stultification goes, protocols evolve all the fucking time. ECMAScript 6 is not Eichman's flipperbaby anymore. C89 is not C11 is not C17 is not C23. This is a bullshit excuse from a fed shepherd leading unquestioning Schneierbots into technological kettling.
I'm afraid I don't understand.
The baby doesn't get it. Color me shocked.
Currently, on say, twitter, you can easily subscribe to accounts dedicated to sharing news on a specific topic (for example http://twitter.com/planet_lisp ). If you like decentralization you can subscribe to an aggregated rss feed ( https://planet.lisp.org/ ). So we already have the technology facilities to allow users to curate content for other users.
Do you mean that moderation should also work this way? You subscribe to a moderator, who then shares a blacklist of posts and users he banned? And this is going to change everything?
Blacklists and citations are for B people. You can't get it.
You can go to usenet, irc, gopher, gemini or whatever if you hate people who aren't into outdated, under-performing technology and like to inconvenience themselves for no reason.
Tell me you're the bowel movement of hacker news without telling me you're the bowel movement of hacker news. If I wanted to read endless bullshit from eunuchs that cannot use the thing for anything but talking about how much better the thing is, I have /prog/, thank you very much.
Otherwise you can go on discord and find a niche community for the thing you care about. Unless it's mismanaged, a discord server should be free from grifters and trolls, and the shitposting will be contained to a channel or two you can silence. User choice sure is nice. (decentralized alternatives: matrix/revolt/whatever)
What a clueless slave.
You might like user-filter captchas, never seen them except for mathchan though. Although by the way it's implemented, I wouldn't let the owner post on the computer science board.
Maybe you should go back. Scratch that; you should go back.