>>21
The sodomite statement is for ignarus it's a freeform legal term with no consistent backing. There's an assumption his acquaintance requires that stunted knowledge from certain jurisdictions having homosexual intercourse as sodomy charges and those jurisdictions considering sodomy inconceivable.
Instead of making a direct claim it's a abstract fork if. Whatever the jurisdiction considers sodomy conceiving and how it's tested in a case is on the reader's lawyer to comprehend.
Since futanari are intersex
That's an assumption a axiom of the hypothesis. Dictoral terminology is at the same base just as fallible.
Work this hypothesis using as many datasets as it takes to a 40% conclusion so it can become theory. If those datasets can not be reproduced or even found erase the hypothesis.
even flat-chest futanari is straight so long as you are not in fact a futanari.
In fact a futanari with the same chomo makeup it could be futanari is multiple different chomos but the standard male and famale chomos.
That is until you get data calling a standard single orientation transsexual futanari. Localised or mistranslated perhaps.