The whole concept of nature is flawed. It would be more accurate to distinguish between human made and not human made.
That being said and sticking with the common usage of nature as not human made, the concept of a state of nature is still flawed when applied to human societies, as no matter what they do, it is necessarily human made.
With that out of the way again, I still disagree with Hobbes in so far as I see no value in tyranny. It's not better than total uncontrolled violence. It is simply the logical consequence, when the bigger fish keeps eating the smaller fish. Anarchist socialism is on the opposite end of the spectrum and in the infinite future. Nothing could be farther from pre-human nature.