>>117
You intend to archive data for centuries and never Change the Book?
The approach doesn't scale. You can have ~1000 books but a single website will dwarf this 'data archive'. Do you have a copy of wikipedia in print form? Arguably most useful archival target, yet i don't see "10 year old" wikipedia books, because in ten years its outdated, however the book-worshipper's book's magically stay fresh for centuries. The real data rot is in your head - your ancient rotting information is no longer relevant,obsolete or supersedes by newer version of it.