Do programmers really love writting LOTTA code in most beloved low level unsafe Rust with manual memory management, pointers, and constantly maintaning in mind memory model overhead of a code?
e.g. spending more resources, calories & time on typing more, longer code?
e.g. spending more resources, calories & time on reading longer code?
what would Grugbrain dev say?
is offloading of complexity to compiler, typechecker, static analyzer by making more verbose code (& less human & less accessible) code -- good?
or
is less verbose, less safe, prone to errors & more expressive, more accessible, more natural lang code -- better?
>>2
"Make it correct, then make it efficient, then make it beautiful."
According to the saying above, correctness is the most important. Therefore, one should offload complexity to the compiler to reduce errors.
At some point processor architecture will evolve from babbage's analytic engine to better reflect what we actually use them for today