I know Schemers take pride in how many of their special forms can be derived just from a few fundamental forms, but in Smalltalk they don't even have special forms, everything is just messages and there's the non-local exit ^. Does this make Smalltalk better than Scheme?
Smalltalk for lispers:
https://live.exept.de/doc/online/english/programming/stForLispers.html
>>1
That is heresy. The Scheme inquisitors are on their way, and you had better repent for your dangerous questions before it is too late.
My Scheme is a Smalltalk.
Besides the fundamental difference of function-oriented versus object oriented
What's that difference? They are the same thing!
>>5
oopfrens should just use functions then
Has Scheme been implemented in Smalltalk? Has Smalltalk been implemented in Scheme?
That is the question.
Smalltalk
Bigtalk when ╮(￣ω￣;)╭
Smalltalkers waste all their time on small talk. Schemers waste all their time on scheming. As a result, both groups never get anything done.
>>7
http://books.pharo.org/booklet-AMiniSchemeInPharo/
Pharo is a Smalltalk dialect.