now do lisp.
oh wait
https://justine.lol/sectorlisp2/
So people of the old were just stupid, inventing COBOL, since one could have put a proper language on a set of 7 punched cards?
>>3
tis what you get when you mix capitalism w/the art of programming
iS tHiS ISO-C99 cOmPliANt?
No Structs, Globals ONLY, Final Destination
>>5
How close is Jone's FORTH to standard compliant (apparently no truly compliant: https://www.forth.org/ansforth/ansforth.html)? Would be interesting to an small interpreter in assembly which could run portable libraries.
>>7
Looks like not too far off: https://github.com/codescribe/jonesforth/blob/master/TODO
https://github.com/alexfru/SmallerC
This one compiles for dos (16 and 32 bit), windows and linux, can compile itself
Very interesting (✧ω✧)
Forsp: A Forth+Lisp Hybrid Lambda Calculus Language
>>10
Interesting 4th Lisp.
There is a Lisp with 4th syntax.
Called Factor https://factorcode.org/
amazing
Did you knew that x86 MOV is turing complete?
Here is a C compiler targeting it:
https://github.com/Battelle/movfuscator?tab=readme-ov-file
Author claims people will have hard time cracking the compiled code.
>>10
they should have called it lithp
Hi, I'm Lex (they/them)
You've found a video about one of my many silly projects.
This one is a compiler that you communicate with by fax.
The code for it is all on github, if you want to build your own: https://github.com/lexbailey/compilerfax
they/them
stopped reading there
Only the gay men are obsessed about other people's genitals.
Lets keep programming clean of gaybro toxicity.
Either 16 posted this on the wrong thread, or forgot to edit the post.
>>17
neat. The party of ignorance can't read English let alone the manual for conversing with others.
>>16
Indeed.
>>17
This.