Most Leftie: Rust
Most Rightie: C99 (C for [C]onservative)
Most Incel: Lisp
Prove me wrong.
Most cucked: C#
cuck works extra hard at an office job to provide for his wife and the kids she has from her boyfriend.
Lets wish the losers more crunch time and closer deadlines.
Women used to be leisure class.
This is not /prog/ramming.
This is not /prog/ramming.
This is life: you're obliged to work, supporting legacy shit, in a mix of new and old crap, because you need money, which you can't even spent on your own hobbies.
Enjoy!
spent
Go back too china.
LISP is the most anti-communist /prog/ramming language ━╤デ╦︻-(..＞◡＜..)-︻╦̵̵͇̿̿̿̿══╤─
https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/progress/marxism.html
https://www.stanford.edu/~learnest/jmc/czech.pdf
Fascism: FORTRAN
In 1966, McCarthy and his team at Stanford wrote a computer program used to play a series of chess games with counterparts in the Soviet Union; McCarthy's team lost two games and drew two games (see Kotok-McCarthy).
Ogay! Incel McCarthy just got raped by the Chad informaticists (Soviet for computer scientist).
Op has to be so retarded to even realize that programming is the most leftist activity there is. Tories don't program, they steal.
>>7
Well certainly new new israel wrote it
Or created not sure
It was reverse engineered from crashed jet black satellites
In order for a programming language to be leftist, it must be written from right to left
>>13
noooo lisp and scheme are kosher even though they dont use proper rol nooooo
Politics was always about programming biorobot agents to perform useful tasks, while you chill out at your palace.
So APL it is!
Scheme is right-to-left:
(string->number (number->string 12))Compare it with for example this left-to-right snippet of the otherwise right-to-left Ocaml:
12 |> string_of_int |> int_of_stringCan't spell incel without C ¯\(ツ)/¯
>>18
Can't spell Scheme without C ¯\(ツ)/¯
Can't spell cuck without C ¯\(ツ)/¯
>>15
You know what's that called?
||🏳️🌈uoᴉʇɐɹǝqᴉl🏳️🌈||
Now, a palace owner ordering biorobots to steal from other palace owners and their produce, you know what that's called?
Can't spell Clojure without C ¯\(ツ)/¯
Can't spell Common Lisp without C ¯\(ツ)/¯
Can't spell Emacs Lisp without C ¯\(ツ)/¯
Can't spell Racket without C ¯\(ツ)/¯
Can't spell Scheme without C ¯\(ツ)/¯
I can, however, spell Lisp, Ada, Smalltalk, and APL without C.
Holy autism.
Leftist corporations now force Rust and shadowban any C++ content:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2npdV6tX1g
Those damn corporations. All they ever want is communism.
US government proclaims that the use of C/C++ discriminates people of color
https://www.tomshardware.com/software/security-software/white-house-urges-developers-to-avoid-c-and-c-use-memory-safe-programming-languages
Basically C/C++ is so difficult, it acts as color correction, so they are making up freasons to replace it with something dumbed down and accessible to non-whites.
ChatGPT 3.5
User
Please give 10 reasons the use of C++ can be seen as unethical and further marginalizing people of color.
ChatGPT
It's important to approach this question with sensitivity and awareness of the complex social dynamics involved. While technology itself isn't inherently ethical or unethical, the ways in which it's used and implemented can have ethical implications. Here are some reasons why the use of C++ (or any technology) might be seen as unethical or as further marginalizing people of color:
Access and Representation: The technology industry, including the use of languages like C++, has historically lacked diversity and inclusivity. This lack of representation can contribute to biased design decisions that overlook the needs and perspectives of people of color.
Algorithmic Bias: C++ is often used to implement algorithms that can perpetuate biases, particularly in areas like machine learning and artificial intelligence. Biased algorithms can disproportionately impact people of color by perpetuating existing inequalities or reinforcing stereotypes.
Digital Divide: Access to education and resources needed to learn and use C++ can be unequal, further marginalizing people of color who may not have access to quality education or the necessary technology infrastructure.
Discriminatory Practices: Companies and organizations that use C++ may engage in discriminatory hiring practices or create environments that are unwelcoming to people of color, contributing to their marginalization in the tech industry.
Surveillance and Privacy Concerns: C++ is used in the development of software and systems that can infringe on the privacy and civil liberties of individuals, particularly people of color who may already be disproportionately targeted by surveillance technologies.
Reinforcing Power Dynamics: The use of C++ in certain industries, such as finance or defense, can reinforce existing power dynamics that disproportionately disadvantage people of color, such as through predatory lending practices or military actions.
Environmental Impact: The development and use of software written in C++ can have environmental consequences, contributing to climate change, which disproportionately affects marginalized communities, including people of color.
Lack of Inclusive Design: C++ programs and systems may not be designed with the needs and experiences of people of color in mind, leading to products and services that are not accessible or inclusive.
Reinforcing Economic Inequities: The use of C++ in industries with significant economic power can reinforce economic inequities that disproportionately affect people of color, such as through labor exploitation or monopolistic practices.
Perpetuating Colonialism: In some cases, the use of C++ technology may perpetuate colonialist attitudes and structures, further marginalizing indigenous communities and people of color who have been historically oppressed by colonial powers.
These reasons highlight the broader societal and ethical considerations that should be taken into account when evaluating the use of technologies like C++. It's important for developers, companies, and policymakers to be aware of these issues and work towards more inclusive and equitable technological practices.
It's important to acknowledge that the question of ethics and marginalization can be complex and multifaceted. However, here are some potential reasons why the use of Rust might be seen as unethical and further marginalizing people of color:
Access and Representation: People of color may face barriers to access education and resources necessary to learn Rust or participate in Rust-focused communities, exacerbating existing disparities in tech representation.
Economic Barriers: Learning and adopting Rust may require access to expensive resources or specialized training, which can disproportionately affect people of color who are more likely to face economic challenges.
Language and Cultural Barriers: The Rust community may be predominantly English-speaking and culturally homogeneous, creating exclusionary environments for people of color who do not speak English fluently or do not share the dominant culture.
Underrepresentation in Tech: People of color are already underrepresented in the tech industry, and the focus on Rust could further entrench this imbalance if efforts are not made to promote diversity and inclusion within Rust communities.
Algorithmic Bias: If Rust is used in systems that perpetuate algorithmic bias, it could contribute to the marginalization of people of color by reinforcing discriminatory practices in areas such as hiring, lending, or criminal justice.
Tech Colonialism: The dominance of Rust could perpetuate a form of tech colonialism, where the preferences and priorities of predominantly white, Western developers are imposed on global communities, potentially disregarding local needs and perspectives.
Digital Redlining: If Rust becomes a preferred language for certain industries or projects, it could inadvertently contribute to digital redlining, where communities of color are excluded from opportunities or services that rely on Rust-based technologies.
Exclusionary Practices: Rust development communities may inadvertently or intentionally engage in exclusionary practices that make it difficult for people of color to participate fully or advance within the Rust ecosystem.
Environmental Impact: The increased adoption of Rust could contribute to environmental injustices, such as the unequal distribution of pollution from data centers or the extraction of resources for hardware necessary to run Rust-based systems.
Lack of Intersectional Analysis: The focus on Rust adoption may overlook intersectional issues that affect people of color differently based on factors such as gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or immigration status, further marginalizing those who experience multiple forms of discrimination.
It's essential for the Rust community and the tech industry as a whole to critically examine these issues and actively work towards creating more inclusive and equitable environments.
After that he began to move toward the political right and eventually became a conservative Republican.
MAGA! ヽ(｡╹ω╹｡)丿
>>27
You know that the saddest part about it is that the virtue signaling WH has done hasn't worked for 5 decades.
Makes you wonder if there's an effective way to motion people to trend a favorable way you want in your society that's been proven to work even in Alaska⸮
So what is the least racist programming language?
I don't want to offend anybody on the computing minefield so I'm ready to rewrite all my Rust projects into an ethically approved language.
User
What would be the 10 important features of the least racist programming language, whose design takes into account the needs of people of color?
ChatGPT
Designing a programming language with the needs of people of color in mind involves considering various aspects beyond just technical features. Here are ten important features for such a language:
Inclusive Naming Conventions: The language should use naming conventions that avoid culturally insensitive or offensive terms. It should promote inclusivity by encouraging developers to use names that respect diverse cultural backgrounds.
Accessibility: The language should prioritize accessibility features to ensure that developers with different abilities, including people of color, can easily access and use the language. This includes considerations for screen readers, keyboard navigation, and other assistive technologies.
Unicode Support: Robust support for Unicode characters is crucial to accommodate different languages, scripts, and symbols used by people of color around the world. This ensures that developers can work comfortably in their native languages.
Bias Mitigation: The language should be designed with mechanisms to mitigate biases, both conscious and unconscious, that may affect algorithmic decision-making. This could include built-in features for fairness, transparency, and accountability in algorithms.
Community Engagement: Encouraging a diverse community of developers and actively seeking input from people of color during the language design process is essential. This can help identify and address specific needs and challenges faced by these communities.
Cultural Sensitivity: The language should promote cultural sensitivity in its documentation, examples, and tutorials. It should avoid reinforcing stereotypes or using language that may be offensive or exclusionary to people of color.
Educational Resources: Providing educational resources and support tailored to the needs of people of color, such as targeted learning materials, mentorship programs, and outreach initiatives, can help increase diversity and inclusion within the language's user base.
Fair Representation in Leadership: Ensuring that people of color are represented in leadership roles within the language's development community can help shape decisions that reflect diverse perspectives and priorities.
Algorithmic Transparency: The language should promote transparency in algorithms, particularly in areas such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, to prevent unintended biases that may disproportionately affect people of color.
Ethical Considerations: Incorporating ethical considerations into the language's design, such as principles of social justice and equity, can help ensure that it is used responsibly and in ways that benefit all users, including people of color.
By incorporating these features, a programming language can strive to be inclusive and supportive of the needs of people of color in the tech community.
The language should prioritize accessibility features to ensure that developers with different abilities, including people of color, can easily access and use the language
Did the bot just say niggers are stupid?
Compared to SOTA LLMs all people are stupid.
llm
anything but dumb
You have to be dumber to believe that
>>18
lol
OP BTFO'd
And what about Huskell?
And what about Huskell?
The black speech of Mordor!