[ prog / sol / mona ]

prog


What SICP could be worse than the JavaScript edition?

1 2023-07-25 23:39

I really hope that there would not be a PHP edition of SICP.

2 2023-07-26 01:57

>>1 if ONLY....

that would be incredible

3 2023-07-26 06:33

At least JavaScript and PHP are real languages. It could be worse. They could have used a useless toy language like Scheme.

4 2023-07-26 16:53

It's too bad that SICP's Creative Commons license allows heretics to legally create and distribute deviant editions of The Book.

5 2023-07-29 08:52

I guess something without functions as objects.

6 2023-07-30 02:03

Oof the possibilities are limitless...
I propose C

7 2023-07-31 04:47

I propose vimscript

8 2023-07-31 11:25

Stop raping the Good Book!

9 2023-07-31 23:02

>>7
Structure and Interpretation of Vim Plugins, aka SIVP.

10 2023-08-01 06:31

>>4,8
This would have prevented the desecration of the book:

© 1996 by The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All Rights Reserved.

However, for proselytization, the CC BY-ND 4.0 license [1] would be more appropriate. The existing CC BY-SA 4.0 license [2] is a grave danger because it encourages heresy and schisms. Scheme must remain the sole liturgical language of SICP.

[1]: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
[2]: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

11 2023-08-05 12:58

>>10
pure cult fanaticism

12 2023-08-05 15:09 *

>>11
And I like it!

13 2023-08-05 18:24

The BASIC version would be the fucking worst. Bonus points if it's one of those older versions that hardly supported structured programming.

On an opposite note, what language (non-lisp) would SICP translate best into? I'd go for TCL.

14 2023-08-06 08:03

>>11
Cults and Scheme
Things are seldom what they seem
Skim milk masquerades as cream

15 2023-08-06 14:57

>>13
I wonder if FORTH would be a good candidate.

16 2023-08-06 15:45

I propose bash and POSIX sh.

17 2023-08-14 05:29

>>1

PHP edition of SICP

https://textboard.org/sol/899/5

18


VIP:

do not edit these