>>48
When has it been too much? I can understand the difficulty of following an indiscriminate stream of everyone's ideas, but that's just how an anonymous project like this ought to work, and it's a terrible idea to try and fragment it when nobody can be sure that anyone's committed. I understand and respect that anonymity is part of the site's spirit, and it's perfectly adequate to keep it that way. Like I tried to say in >>42, we should be able to gather in another place like IRC if we want to, and using pseudonyms isn't really a big deal; however keeping all potential interest in one place should be the goal.