>>64-67
Wow! Thanks for the patches. I can't express my gratitude enough in those apocalyptic times. (I just managed to have a working system again, I'm installing MIT Scheme 9.2 and will detail the long overdue installation of SchemeBBS)
While the regex seems correct when I try it at the REPL, there's a weird bug with the transform rule, as in >>65:
>>1,10-20,30
I have to sort this out.