>>47
Fairly buggy, it feels like some features have been tacked on without any real testing, and then nobody ever used them, so they stay faulty. Frames are interesting as a concept, but ultimately a pain to use in practice. Iffy support for truetype fonts, and there's no granular control over font and its properties in different components (like message windows, toolbar, and so on). Overall, it seems to me like the design is not really good (though it might be just my personal bias), and there are not enough contributors to fix all the issues. Furthermore, the focus of the most active contributors is to add more stuff, that is also potentially broken, just adding to the pile.
Note that the last time I've interacted with it was probably months ago, so you'd need to evaluate whether any of what I've said is still true yourself.