>>23
Nope, EXWM is far more stable than StumpWM these days. Shit it can't even load truetype fonts without slowing down the whole damn UI. Emacs blockage is rare to non-existent if you know how to avoid it, users don't have much trouble there. BUT the real gem in using both of these WMs is the builtin support for the so called "simulation keys" (StumpWM acquired this functionality after EXWM) and this stuff makes the nEXT browser keybinding scheme a bit redundant (it still gets points for extensibility I guess). With simulation keys you can configure keybinding translations per window class, let's say make C-k send Ctrl-x in Firefox or C-x C-c to send Ctrl-q etc.