>>2
While I appreciate the complement, I'm afraid this isn't my site. The anon who wrote it did visit a IRC channel I hang out in awhile back and said he wanted to stick to the earliest revision of the HTML standard as possible though, so maybe it has something to do with this? I'll look around at the original standard and what anon is doing to see if there is a better way to do this: https://gitlab.com/naughtybits/schemebbs
Anyway, what are you working on anon?