https://www.concatenative.org/wiki/view/Concatenative%20language
Why didn't languages like Forth and PostScript catch on?
Concatenative languages such as Forth force you to anally deform your brain into the shape of a stack. Besides that, they don't offer any advantages. Having formal parameters in functions is a big win, and concatenative languages lose because of that.
>>2
Never understood why you couldn't have formal parameters in a stack-based language.
foul language
>>4
Cool, but that doesn't explain why you *cannot* have formal parameters.
You totally can. Webassembly does that. It combins the worst of lisp, FORTH and the JVM.
>>6
Nobody says you can't.
I say you can't.
>>9 nobody youre not a programmer