>>9
It doesn't seem like there has been any innovation in 15+ years, just more of the same and exploiting the improved manufacturing process. They're going to keep beating the dead horse as long as they can, Intel has plans to make 1.4nm chips, and are likely to continue pushing the material engineering until there is nothing left but ketchup stains and x86 or similar.
The issue is that any significant change in hardware would require a change in software to exploit them. The switching cost is too high to be competitive, and the barriers to entry are too high for any madman to even try. The way you make money in software has little to do with quality, performance, or utility anyway. Software seems entirely driven by novelty, and manipulative interfaces.