>>33
a dictionary based encoding is definitively a mistake, even if a language were to be static and strictly defined you would not solve any problem by storing words instead of characters because speech is not composed of words, it is composed of verbs, nouns, adjectives, subjects, articles, etc. Their arrangement follows a set of rules and it is possible to make an encoding about them. in fact, everything i have said already exists, it use however is about data mining and surveillance, the use of auto-correctors has been forced into the populace to ease said purposes, grammar nazis are useful idiots. that is why i would ever opose an encoding that isn't dumb, it doesn't make communication better for anyone but makes it easier for computers to recognize, if you don't understand what is being said then ask the other to explain, there is no way around it.
a good idea would be however to not let computers handle written language, let IPA be our only encoding or write everything irl and OCRize it when needed.