>>9,11
I find the implication behind this argument hillarious. Just because a compiler or interpreter for language A is written in B, B must be "better" than A? Like A wasn't compiled by some other compiler, or written by hand? And as anyone knows, no processor runs interprets programming languages, just binary code. There are many things to care about a langauge (how it handles errors, what overhead it incurrs, etc.) but this is a kindergarden-tier mentality.