>>6
Fits the question better then sections of the first programming manual and this whitepaper, don't understand why LISP wasn't defined as LISt Processor again.
The LISP 1.5 and 1 programmer manuals are considered LISP-1* and not LISP in the entirety or even parts depending on who you ask. Would of preferred a lambda papers style over this, it really is sourced from multiple sections across different papers spanning across decades.
Flap Trap