>>227
A primitive mind would view it as madness that someone who is in their eyes a person who "opposes LISP" would dedicate so much effort at correcting its flaws.
My motivation is to help LISP/Scheme programmers recognize the flaws and improve their code, so their "Anaconda Eggs" will be actually competitive with C libraries instead of being a historical footnote. I have no actual bias against LISP as a concept(which different from actual implementation and LITHPers that proclaim grandiose benefits of LISP without basis in reality). LISP can be much better than it is, yet elitist LISP weenies want to hold it back. Instead of oinking, please criticize >>222