>>40,41
There honestly aren’t too many faults with HTML 5 in comparison to older versions of the standard, the only things that come to mind is the addition of the <canvas> tag, and the switch from W3C to WHATWG, and with the end of the standardization effort. In general XML and HTML especially are a bit nasty in that they’re super wasteful formats, and they aren’t as simple to parse as they should be. If you listen to verisimilitudes even text formats are inefficient and should be replaced, and he’s probably right.