>>20
I didn't want to call you out as being Bitdiddle merely based on >>15. I didn't expect you to do it yourself either. This is your third episode on this board, after
https://textboard.org/prog/39#t39p165
and
https://textboard.org/prog/39#t39p238
The first one you passed off as
https://textboard.org/prog/39#t39p244
I admit, I was pissed off that one time, a few weeks ago, but not now. There were other problems around me back then...
and the second one as
I'm just overplaying my own (presumed) character for laughs and giggles. I may have untreatable anxiety problems and a weird deadpan sense of humour but that's irrelevant. I actually feel much better when I'm somewhat productive.
At least one other Anon noticed, the one with
https://textboard.org/prog/39#t39p243
Calm your horses, Benny boy. You're better than that.
who referred to you in a way I wouldn't. I am simply not used to getting such outlandish reactions to dry inquiries, so I am still learning how to make such dry inquiries in your case without causing these reactions, because they are completely new to me. We have had other interactions in which you had no problems maintaining your composure.
whining
suspicion
paranoia
This part speaks for itself.
24 hours after
You will understand that some of us are too busy with other things to respond in 19 minutes. Slow exchanges are common on low-volume boards.
Do you want me to open a curious.cat account for all your future questions?
I am perfectly fine with all SchemeBBS questions being on textboard.org. A desire for a different venue can only come from one who is not fine with all SchemeBBS questions being on textboard.org.
What does this have to do with open hardware?
Once you have calmed down, you will see it is exactly as much as the "On a side note" post in >>11.