[ prog / sol / mona ]

prog


A Lisp hacker

121 2022-01-14 01:31 *

>>120
Simple data, probability and timing algorithms can achieve Q8591 having Q8412 Q8512 Q8915 after, in under a nibble. This can become Q8591 without that nibble passed, using psychoanalysts and stylometry. This isn't part of q encoding but how the dictionary hardware handles performance. Q encoding is chosen here for compatibility with already defined symbols, something else better could be thought up without effort.

Initial without data on the hardware.

archipelago system - Q8591Q8412Q8512Q8915 - hardware

Learned data from usage using probability algorithms and input timing.

archipelago system - Q8591b0111 and recorded timing - hardware with recorded usage

Small uncompromising data sent from the system balanced against the payload size.

archipelago system and data - Q8591b0111 and recorded timing - hardware with recorded usage

Everything but with psychoanalysts and stylometry.

archipelago system - Q8591 and psychoanalysts from external hardware - hardware with learned stylometry and psychoanalysts

The idea is if Q8591 is a infinite big integer, infer the whole payload with that integer alone up to how ever much can be inferred and tell the archipelago system if more data is needed. On a system with bytes, it would be theoretically possible for a yottabyte to be expressed in one byte. Somehow the archipelago system still has to show the symbols, the idea is dictionary hardware works with the graphics hardware and sends allocated visual space back to the archipelago system. There the load on the archipelago system is tiny, the graphics hardware small from deduplication and huge on the asic within reasonable power usage.

It is possible for Q8591 to be shortened but this is no longer q encoding since the whole integer for the character is necessary, this Q8591b0111 isn't q encoding but Q8591 becoming a trillion other symbols with q encoding points is.

169


VIP:

do not edit these