>>210
I've tried this long ago https://github.com/lem-project/lem/issues/43 A sane lisp environment to replace elipth, too bad I can't replace emacs yet https://github.com/lem-project/lem/issues/602
https://github.com/emacs-lsp/dap-mode#Summary
https://build-server-protocol.github.io/docs/specification#relationship-with-lsp
Yes it's personal preference to use my scheme ide with other languages and have the support for those other languages be warded off. Why deal with a buggy lem extension trying it's own nih take on ocaml completion?
I'd call out false advertising but it's a fair project regardless. Like to know more about how much lem extensions use lemmington or some issue tracking native org babel support. Also wish to know how lem handles multiple embedded languages https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/MultipleModes
What a shame that there are multiple multiple mode modes. As soon as you need mode X that requires multiple mode M1, while already using another mode which uses multiple mode M2, you’re loading far more than you need to. Just because TIMTOWTDI (sorry for the perl-ism) doesn’t mean you must do it more than one way.I'd really hope lem won't have this issue https://lem-project.github.io/usage/extension_modes or at minimum avoid it for the common case of embedded languages.