I wonder why the new world order promoted feminism, I guess it's more political (and has to do with subversion) then for any productivity questions.
Lol, the woman I observed with thinking about that, just after loosing so much time in front of here mirror, went to a dirtying task.
I wish women were real.
why the new world order promoted feminism
It's some careful scheme against the population to turn structural demographic s against them.
The wars among the nations are measured in bodies and when the women are destroyed there are fewer bodies to supply because there are fewer made. It's that simple.
Not with old women!
Divide et impera.
https://ossiana.substack.com/p/when-friendliness-is-seen-as-creepy
https://ossiana.substack.com/p/tradwives-are-starting-to-realize
LGBTQ writer, adult industry writer, food critic, freelance writer. Vampire with a sun allergy. Non-binary.
Into the trash it goes.
ChatGPT 4
User
Summarize the following, then expand it to cover five paragraphs.
Civilization is a pattern that emerges from necessity by means of overpopulation. At a certain rate of growth, meaningful labor becomes impossible to discover and necessity disappears. At this point, militarization is inevitable, as expansion is always useful to civilization and idle men break shit. Yet, once these militaristic frontiers are closed, nihilistic liberalism for the idle classes is then the only option. You cannot constrain action, as this creates idle people, who break the shit of nonidle people. You cannot tell them what to do, as idle people forced into labor break more shit than merely idle people. As the process of automation and rationalization create economic efficiency, more people end up in the idle classes. It happened to the Great Northern Migration, where generations of ex-slaves migrated to northern industrial hubs at their meridian, doomed to inherit urban rot. The same thing happened broadly to women in the 1950s with appliances and birth control in the 1960s. They no longer *need* to fulfil their *telos*, so they don't.
There's no conspiracy behind this; simply a confluence of
factors emerging from the limits to growth.
>>8
So the writer is politically queer and it's behind a paywall. What the fuck.