Harassment includes ...
>Comments that reinforce systemic oppression related to gender, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation, disability, mental illness, neurodiversity, physical appearance, body size, age, race, or religion.
>Unwelcome comments regarding a person's lifestyle choices and practices, including those related to food, health, parenting, drugs, and employment.
>Deliberate misgendering
>Deliberate use of "dead" or rejected names
note: harrasment requires reoccurence. Each above-listed ``harrasment,'' done singly, is not harrasment. (No reoccurence.)
The whole text serves as a lame excuse to bring in and validate gender identity or the idea that someone isn't what they are, but what they say they are. (note my use of gender-neutral pronouns here)
Note his use of the plural nouns to refer to singular or not-necessarily plural items. (Note my use of generic singular pronoun genetive.)
their preferences about their gender identity
note: A preference about one's gender identity, a preference about how an other expresses one's gender identity are different things. I honour latter-type preferences, unless such preference is demand.
Now you'll have endless dramas because some dev used ze/hir or xe/xem/xyr instead of co/cos while referring to another dev's commit.
And they would be poorer for it. Demanding another must speak a particular way reinforces systemic oppression; done twice or more is harrassment. Open your mind---the Free Software Falsity
---False Freedom Federation, the