>>11
I understand the necessity in being specific about language, but such specificity demanded in the first FOUR chapters of this book leads me to wonder, "why bother reading this?"
To be fair I wasn't particularly concerned with the main thread topic anyway.
At the moment I'm not even sure what one could get out of it.
Maybe by seeing things more clearly within the 'proper' definitions of quantity and quality could one... I don't know.
I'm sure there's something you could get out of it with some dedication.
At the moment it just seems depressing and pointless to mull over.
Maybe when I was still in a mood to read ramblings of other philosophers I would've continued to read it.
Not anymore.
Well, I tried. There you go.