Cniles often say that being terse is good but I don't know... with a proper editor (GNU Emacs + company-mode or similar), you should have some kind of autocomplete feature. Simple abbreviation like CAAR or CADR are easy to understand but it can get out of hand very easily.
>>6
this is also what scheme vectors are but the standard pushes implementations to optimize vectors here
sure they can skit but its less likely to optimize `(caddr x)`
>7
dimwit cnile says terse is good because their execution environment cant handle more
midwit lipth commoner says terse is bad because modern machines can already handle the sideeffects of worse is better
ivywit schemer says terse is good because it keeps design proper and allows ease of generating strict proofs while they still use a lisp machine like environment to program in their own scheme >>5
and you decided to use a lisp machine like environment thats the worst lisp as an example of a proper editor