>>50
Historically communist states had a "right to employment", and did not care about the environment. Communism isn't a welfare state with environmental protection, it's a working man's state. Their focus was on industrialization, and preventing surplus value extraction by an elite (although failing to a degree). Surplus value extraction beyond necessary to sustain the means of production is an inefficiency, it means taking capital that could be spent on improving industry and spending it on the "leisure class". Your communism and Marxism in practice (or in theory for that matter) are so remarkably different that it's hard for me to imagine that Marcuse inc. would have been able to convince anyone of this.
Marxist theory states that capitalism will drive wages to sustenance levels, and that this will cause revolution. This is done because of the tendency of profits to fall, an inherent property of the capitalist mode of production... Perhaps your intention is not only agitprop but a targeted attack to reduce faith in the common man, and to distract in the short term. Probably the best algo is to ignore you as I was doing before.