>>47
Actually rereading you're not too far off. The goal isn't equity, but compensation for the tendency of the rate of profit to fall. The "Great Reset" where you'll "own nothing and like it." is not a conspiracy of the disciples of Marcuse, but of the richest and most powerful people on the planet. The idea is not to centralize control, but to commodify (excellent for rich gamblers with a fix in the system) through artificial scarcity as much as possible. The state would merely exist as an enforcement mechanism for the market, being stripped of most its relevant regulatory capacity. Reducing what is considered subsistence (e.g. I can no longer eat meat, have to always be on call for work, am expected to close and open the store, am denied a collective bargaining etc.) is a means to increase surplus value extraction from workers, while reconciling the artificial scarcity. Then again I suppose it wouldn't be good agitprop if their weren't a grain of truth in it. This peculiar sort of mirroring of legitimate concern in clearly false statements has been a common play since jet trials were claimed to be aliens. You'd think the rule book would have changed since, but I guess not.